Sri Lanka is located about 31km (18.5 miles) off the southern coast of India. For much of the last 20 years it has suffered fighting between the armed forces of the predominantly Sinhalese government and Tamil Tiger rebels who want an independent homeland in the north and east.
Sri Lanka is a multi-ethnic country, with a population of 18m people. It is an ancient centre of Buddhism. It also has a significant number of Hindus, Christians and Muslims. There are also a number of smaller communities such as the Burghers and the Veddas.
The civil war has killed about 64,000 people, displaced one million and held back the island's growth and economic development.
The origins of the current violence go back to the island's independence from Britain in 1948.
Although the years immediately following the end of colonial rule were largely peaceful, from the outset there were tensions between the majority Sinhalese community - who are mostly Buddhist - and the Tamil community who are mostly either Hindu or Roman Catholic.
The communities speak different languages - Sinhala and Tamil - and both claim their ancestors were original settlers on the island.
While the island's population enjoys what is arguably the highest per capita standard of living in South Asia, in the years after independence the Tamil community complained of discrimination when it came to getting jobs in the civil service or winning places at universities.
The government argued it was redressing the imbalance from colonial times when Sinhalas accused the British of giving preferential treatment to Tamils.
The run-up to war
Resentment over perceived discrimination was cited by the Tamil Tiger leader, Prabhakaran, as the motivating factor behind his decision to form the Tamil New Tigers militia in 1972. In 1976, this body changed its name to the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) more commonly known as the Tamil Tigers.
The cause of "Eelam" - a Tamil homeland in the north and east - has been invoked to justify countless suicide bombings by the Tigers on civilian and military targets.
One of the first such attacks was ordered by Prabhakaran in 1983, when the Tamil Tigers attacked an army patrol in the north of the country.
That in turn led to anti-Tamil riots in which an estimated 600 people were killed and thousands displaced.
Pattern emerges
From that moment onwards, it can be argued that the Sri Lankan conflict followed a pattern that in many ways is still repeated today.
Throughout the 1980s, 1990s and for parts of this decade, the country has witnessed a combination of Tamil Tiger suicide attacks on the one hand and repeated military skirmishes in the north and east on the other.
The violence over this time period has been interspersed by various international efforts to negotiate a peace settlement: technically the two sides are not at war despite the recent violence, as neither has formally withdrawn from a peace treaty signed in 2002.
Both the military and the Tamil Tigers have been frequently accused of gross violations of human rights by international rights groups.
Civilians have been routinely murdered and thousands made homeless by the years of war.
The fighting has been complicated by the existence of shadowy paramilitary groups. Also a group of rebels led by their eastern commander, Karuna, broke away from the Tamil Tigers in March, 2004.
The conflict has also had a disastrous impact on reconstruction efforts after the December 2004 Asian tsunami with the distribution of international aid hampered by the fighting.
Can either side secure a military triumph?
Neither seems to have the muscle to win outright military victory - although both have had their successes.
In recent months it can perhaps be argued that while the conflict is no less winnable for either side - it has become a great deal more bloody.
At least 2,000 people - troops, Tamil Tiger rebels and Tamil, Sinhalese and Muslim civilians - were killed in the first nine months of 2006, the government and truce monitors say.
At least 2,000 people - troops, Tamil Tiger rebels and Tamil, Sinhalese and Muslim civilians - were killed in the first nine months of 2006, the government and truce monitors say.
Unless common ground can be found between the government's oft-stated position that it is only prepared to allow more autonomy for the north and east and the Tiger's desire for full-scale independence for these areas, a solution to this most intractable of disputes looks as far away as ever.
1 comment:
All these happened due the system of governance that is prevailing. Even the implementation of the much sought 17th amendment cannot salvage the country from the utter mess it is today.
It is because “bribery, corruption, injustice and discrimination” has taken over everything and is eating away the fundamentals of civilization. Wide spread corruption and mismanagement of public institutions is found all over the world. It is not peculiar to Sri Lanka which ranks 94 out of 180 countries. Though Sri Lanka is not at the “top” it is NOT at the bottom. Someone said that it has become part of the culture or an integral part of the system.
So, what is the remedy?. The remedy is to change the system of governance itself into one that will not accept “bribery, corruption, injustice and discrimination” as a partner. Once “bribery, corruption, injustice and discrimination” is eradicated nearly 80% of the problems of any country would have been solved, and the balance 20% can be sorted-out easily because “bribery, corruption, injustice and discrimination” the four pillars supporting evil society is not a partner in the governing system.
In the present system of governance one set of elected representatives of the party (supposed representatives of te people) are empowered with all the powers to rule the country degrading the sovereignty of the people from the status of “citizens of the country” to one of “subjects of the country”.
So, separate the powers now exercised by the parliament and empower small and different groups of people’s representatives (not party representatives) to administer each part of the separated power in a part of the country. That means no single group of elected peoples representatives would be having the full power to fully govern even a small part of the country. They (any one group) can only use a specific set of powers to achieve a specific object of a work. This is the basic difference between my proposal and that envisaged for “gramarajya” by Mahatma Gandhi. During the time of Mahatma Gandhi “bribery, corruption, injustice and discrimination” was there but not visible to this extent and so he proposed a fully fledged village council “gramarajya” (or what was called “Gamsabah” in ancient Sri Lanka) . But now “bribery, corruption, injustice and discrimination” has become an “acceptable culture” and partner in the governance of the country.
SO WE WILL HAVE TO FIND WAYS AND MEANS OF ERADICATING BRIBERY, CORRUPTION, INJUSTICE and DISCRIMINATION FOR GOOD GOVERNANCE TO PREVAIL IN ANY COUNTRY and one way is the above mentioned separation of powers and each set of powers handled by a separate set of representatives in a restricted areas like having different ministries/departments for different functions – Administration, Fiscal Management, Development, Planning, Auditing, Law and Order etc.,
The basic idea is promoting the eradication of bribery, corruption, injustice and discrimination and planning from the village level with the needs of the village being given top priority and the powers, duties and functions now vested or usurped in by parliament be SEPARATED and different and distinct powers, duties and functions be given to different and distinct groups of representatives directly elected by the people at different levels of groupings. These powers, duties and functions MUST NOT OVERLAP and the different groups of representatives are connected to form one unit - the Parliament.
It is not the present federal or quasi-federal system in India where there is a Central Government directly elected by the people with powers to dismiss State Governments that too are directly elected by the people.
In the present system (in every part of the world) one elected institution is above/below another elected institution and powers, duties and functions are DELEGATED and overlap and power is shared vertically - one above/below another - from Colombo unto a remote village Council. People elect and authorize an elected body to administer BUT the powers to administer are DELEGATED by Colombo, which retains the power to withdraw an its whims and fancies.
In the proposed/suggested system, nor elected institution is above/below another elected institution and cannot be dismissed by any other elected institution. All institutions are in the same level and enjoy equal rights given directly by the people.
The powers to perform and administer the duties and functions specifically assigned to elected institutions are directly given by the people who elected the institutions and not by ANOTHER institution directly elected by the people. This is a great deviation from the present system.
Post a Comment